Otherwise the facts two defence Kagan

1: 25 O'CLOCK

Robert C. Clark, a colleague of Elena Kagan at Harvard Law was school leads the Wall Street Journal op - ed page today its treatment of Personalbeschaffer militares.Su defence but to defend, based on the omission of essential facts:

In November 2004, but appeals found third circuit Solomon is incorrectly violated law amendment first amendment freedoms Schulen.So returned Mrs Kagan, is not school to its pre-2002, the military OCS practice but allow him, use of group recruiting students.

But lasted only a semester which threatened because of which this reversal once again the Ministry of defence of all Harvard cut federal funding and because the Supreme Court decision of third circuit.Once again reversed, military recruiters were using OCS also if the Dean and most teachers and students of the body against "Don 'T Ask, Don' T tell" expressed.

A reader could forgive after which are derived from this passage third circuit of change Solomon had downed not the force of law and was good law again six months later when the Supreme Court is the third circuito.Pero vice versa the column today laid down as third sucedió.El circuit appeal pending its decision in force; leave was Solomon Amendment Kagan at the school of its policy of pre-2002 all modos.Ella in 2005 due to the threat of the Department of Defense assigned returned; the judgment of the Supreme Court confirmed that you Solomon (unanimously, by the way) not arrive until 2006.

The fact that 2004 requires Professor Clark of decision Kagan is in the defence to such important details of disappearance is rather heavy which unacceptable, the decision was really an illustration.

StumbleUpon

View the Original article