BCS Bowls 2011: Baylor, Kansas State Wrongly Left In The Dust

by JP Starkey • Dec 4, 2011 8:14 PM CST

There's no other way to put it: the Big 12 was screwed over by the BCS selection committees in 2011. Oklahoma State will be the only team to represent the Big 12 conference in a BCS bowl in 2011. Kansas State, ranked eighth in the BCS standings, and Baylor, ranked twelfth, were not invited to any of the at-large BCS bids.

With the SEC sending its champion to the title game, the Sugar Bowl had an opportunity to pick two at-large teams. Instead of taking Baylor, who boasts one of the Heisman frontrunners in Robert Griffin III, or Kansas State, who finished eighth in the final BCS standings, the selection committee took Michigan and Virginia Tech. The same Virginia Tech who was smoked by Clemson in the ACC title game, and finished No. 11 in the BCS standings, and the same Michigan who finished No. 13 in the BCS standings. 

For what reason? Money, of course.

The only actual explanation for Michigan and Virginia Tech being invited to the Sugar Bowl is money. The committee must have figured that, since both are big football schools, that their fanbases would travel much better than either Baylor's or Kansas State's. 

Michigan's record against top 25 teams this were was 1-1 -- certainly, they held their ground, but certainly not BCS worthy. Michigan's best win this season? Against Nebraska, who finished with three losses. Michigan's other wins? Western Michigan, Notre Dame, Eastern Michigan, San Diego State, Minnesota, Northwestern, Purdue, Illinois and Ohio State. Michigan's second loss? Against an Iowa team that finished 7-5. 

Yes, Baylor had an extra loss. One of those losses, though, came to Oklahoma State, who nearly went to play for the BCS title game. Baylor's wins include an upset over TCU, Oklahoma and Texas -- all teams that finished in the top 25 of the final BCS standings. 

And what about Kansas State? Two losses on the season: an eight point loss to Oklahoma State and a blowout loss to Oklahoma -- two teams that finished in the top 15 of the final BCS standings. K-State also boasts better wins than Michigan. In addition to playing in a stronger conference, K-State beat Baylor and Texas, both of who finished in the top 25 of the BCS. 

Virginia Tech's inclusion is less egregious than Michigan's, but still incredibly uninspiring. The Hokies lost twice this year -- both times to the Clemson Tigers. Virginia Tech's best win? That would be a 37-26 win over Georgia Tech, a team that lost four games this season. In three wins over East Carolina, Duke and North Carolina, the Hokies won by a combined 14 points. Those three teams combined for 15 wins this season. 

That the Big 12 was so royally screwed by the selection committees isn't surprising. It simply illustrates the fact that the BCS remains the biggest joke in sports today. Instead of rewarding teams who had an excellent body of work, the selection committees opted to invite teams that would travel well and, presumably, infuse the greatest amount of money into the NCAA and the BCS system. 

But hey, we'll all enjoy the Michigan/Virginia Tech Sugar Bowl as well as the West Virginia/Clemson Orange Bowl, right?

Tweet

View the original article here

BCS Decision Day: Alabama or Oklahoma State

Play it again, LSU and Alabama.

The Crimson Tide edged out Oklahoma State in the final round of voting Sunday and will play the top-ranked Tigers in the BCS national championship game on Jan. 9 in New Orleans.

Undefeated LSU is the only team to beat Alabama this season, and the head BCS official sees a do-over as a perfectly good title game.

"Absolutely, if they're 1 and 2, and they are in all the polls released today," executive director Bill Hancock said.

Still, it's not exactly a game the public was clamoring for — at least outside of Southeastern Conference territory. And it will do nothing to quiet the critics of the Bowl Championship Series or the calls for a college football playoff.

But like it or not, the system has ensured that the SEC — home to both schools — will run its streak of BCS championships to six in a row.

The Cowboys made a late surge by beating Oklahoma 44-10 on Saturday night, and closed the gap between themselves and Alabama in the polls. But it was not enough to avoid the first title game rematch in the 14-year history of the BCS.

The Tigers (13-0) beat the Tide 9-6 in overtime on Nov. 5 in Tuscaloosa.

"This could be a totally different type of game," Alabama coach Nick Saban said. "There's so many good players on both sides of the ball for both teams.

"There's so much opportunity for this game to play out completely different and have a completely different flavor than the first game."

Alabama (11-1) finished second in both the Harris and coaches' polls by a wide enough margin to make up for the fact that Oklahoma State was ahead in the computer ratings.

The Cowboys (11-1), champions of the Big 12, will play in the Fiesta Bowl against Stanford from the Pac-12.

"We can't control it," Oklahoma State quarterback Brandon Weeden said. "But I know we had a heck of a year and we beat really good football teams in this conference and we're conference champions, so we did everything that we could."

The other BCS matchups are:

— Michigan vs. Virginia Tech in the Sugar Bowl;

— Clemson vs. West Virginia in the Orange Bowl;

— Oregon vs. Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl.

No BCS busters made it into the big-money games for the first time since the 2005 season, teams such as Boise State, TCU and Houston, which had a chance but lost in the Conference USA championship on Saturday to Southern Mississippi. The Cougars will now play Penn State, which dropped to the Ticket City Bowl in Dallas following the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal that has overshadowed the Nittany Lions' season.

As the power-brokers in college football begin to plot how top-tier bowls will be set up in the future, the 2011 season is once more exposing the flaws in the current system.

Oklahoma State and Alabama, two teams with perfectly good arguments to play for a national championship, wound up fighting over one spot, with subjective voters and mysterious computer ratings — the formulas of which are not even publicly known — doing the choosing.

Alabama, with the nation's No. 1 defense, won out and will play for its second BCS crown in three years.

Oklahoma State, with one of the most potent offenses in the country, gets its first BCS appearance as a consolation prize.

"We wanted the opportunity to settle the debate that has gone all year about the offense in the Big 12 and the defense in the SEC," Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy said on ESPN.

A rematch between LSU and Alabama in the title game seemed almost a foregone conclusion heading into conference championship weekend.

But with Alabama idle, Oklahoma State made one last, dramatic statement against the Sooners on Saturday night in Stillwater. And the Cowboys had an impressive resume, beating three teams ranked in the final BCS top 15. Alabama had only one such victory.

So instead of Sunday being a coronation there was drama, and another BCS controversy.

Working in Alabama's favor was its dominance throughout the season — all its victories have been by at least 16 points — and the fact that no other team has challenged LSU this season the way Heisman Trophy contender Trent Richardson and the Tide did.

The Tide and Tigers played a hard-hitting defensive slog billed as the Game of the Century. And it was exciting in the way Notre Dame and Army's scoreless tie was exciting in the 1946 version of the Game of the Century.

Immediately the talk of rematch started, pro and con.

Oklahoma State was in position to keep it from happening. The Cowboys were undefeated and second in the BCS standings heading into a Friday night game at Iowa State, a day after Oklahoma State women's basketball coach Kurt Budke and an assistant coach were killed in a plane crash.

But the Cowboys lost 37-31 in double OT to the so-so Cyclones (6-6), missing a potential game-winning field goal at the end of regulation by inches.

With no other undefeated teams left from the major conferences, Alabama returned to No. 2 and the debate grew ever-more heated.

On one side, Alabama supporters said it was simple: The system is supposed to match the best two teams, regardless of conference, and the Tide have been one of the two most dominant teams in the country.

On the other side, Oklahoma State supporters said the Cowboys accomplished more to get to 11-1 than the Tide, playing a tougher schedule and winning their conference.

Not enough voters were convinced — so it's Tigers-Tide II.

Alabama claims 13 national championships overall and is one of the most decorated programs in the land. It's won seven AP titles since the wire service started its poll in 1936.

LSU will be seeking its third BCS championship since 2003 at the Superdome — the site of its first two.

Saban won that title for LSU in '03. Current Tigers coach Les Miles matched his predecessor in 2007, winning a championship with a team that lost two games.

These talented Tigers, led by dynamic defensive back Tyrann Mathieu, have rarely even trailed against a schedule that included Oregon and West Virginia.

"This team loves the big stage," Miles said.

Now Saban and Miles, who have been tussling for supremacy in the SEC West on the field and the recruiting trail, will square off for the ultimate prize.

And don't dare suggest to either of them that it's for anything less.

"I think whoever wins the game should be viewed as the national champion," Saban said, echoing Miles' sentiment. "Rather than rehash the system we should do research on what would make the system better in the future."

____

AP Sports Writer Jeff Latzke in Stillwater, Okla., contributed to this report.

___

Follow Ralph D. Russo at www.Twitter.com/ralphDrussoAP

View the original article here